返回列表 發帖
回復 38# admin


    謝謝ADMIN的建議,我個人估計暫時可以不用這樣限制,否則便阻礙了一些新手又有建設性的意見。不過如果到了一定程度的不理性,這個也是要考慮的方法。
其實人人享有言論自由之餘,都為言論負責。沒建設性、沒實質理據的遲早都會現形。

TOP

回復 19# funfun


    謝謝你的支持﹗

TOP

Pineapple 唔係撐 ck.   佢只係撐 fc. 唔通要學啲政棍係又鬧,唔係又鬧。成日搞衝擊,一啲建設性都冇。

波 ...
cky 發表於 2011-9-13 23:30


Of course, pineapple is a CK person (ie. Core Key person of FC owners).

相信FC業主大多是醒字派 (except me), 如 pineapple 真的是 CK 人而又做出對 FC業主不利的事情, 相信佢很快便收工.

Pineapple 出得黎行, 我相信佢知道會有反對者, 明箭, 暗箭 ..... 但最重要是有一份服務大眾的心.

Support Pineapple

TOP

不妨跟大家講個秘密,PINEAPPLE 真係替CK打工,我、仲有阿邊個同邊都係,CK係我地老闆,有D叻就做20年或更少,有D冇咁叻或且比較喜歡CK這老闆,就同佢簽30年約。

TOP

wipa
真高興,你的批評比k1w好,沒有那麼差勁,所以小弟才願意答咀講講。

不過,不知道你是否就是k1w

"Well, no one is saying wipa is k1w, but just asking. Probably you are not, but what if you are? For the post here, I have not seen wipa said he is not k1w. "

小弟只是問問wipa 是否就是k1w,沒有說wipa 就是k1w呀!

"Well, no one is saying pinapple is working for CK, but just asking. Probably he is not, but what if he is? For all the posts here, I have not seen pineapple said he has no ties with CK."

如果你認為任何人講的意見不合理,大可指出,何需用這種完全強詞奪理的說法!
沙田人,沙田友。
淘寶集運 淘寶開箱  淘寶教學

TOP

本帖最後由 wipa2 於 2011-9-14 06:57 編輯

回復 45# liahyi

Whether k1w is wipa or even wipa2 is kind of obvious, but that is besides the point. I am merely asking a question and you guys are all emotional and you guys are not even pineapple. Really makes me wonder. All along you guys are the people who accused other people with stronger view points to be associated with fruit daily or political parties, what proofs do you have? Did you even ask them? So now here I am, asking this simple question, if there are people from fruit daily or political parties, what about from CK side? Can that also happen? I am not accusing anyone of anything, but please use your brain to think about it and try not to get all emotional, after all, that's what you accused of other people.

TOP

本帖最後由 liahyi 於 2011-9-14 11:07 編輯

wipaX c hing
很高興你回應,大家才能交換意見。
1.  你用"but just asking. Probably you are not, but what if you are?"
     " I am merely asking a question" 來掩飾對pineapple的指控,這是明顯不過的,騙不了大家。

2. 你問pineapple是否CK的人,你要pineapple如何回答?把個人資料在討論區公開?
      pineapple 就算把資料公開,你亦可不斷提問,不斷懷疑,不斷指控!pineapple回答說不是CK的人,
     情況都一樣。是否信任某人,是個人的判斷或喜好,不應毫無根據,便提出指控。

3.  你說"All along you guys are the people who accused other people with stronger view points
     to be associated with fruit daily or political parties, what proofs do you have?"
     這點反而有些道理。不過你亦一樣 what proofs do you have?

4.  我在討論區從未見過有c hing公開指名道姓的質疑其他人,你的做法,大家不滿,是非常明白的。

5.  你說"but please use your brain to think about it and try not to get all emotional, after all,
     that's what you accused of other people."
     希望你也一樣use your brain to think & not to get all emotional。

6.  最後我跟你一樣ask a question。"liahyi,  are you working for Pineapple?"希望你教小弟如何回答?
沙田人,沙田友。

TOP

本帖最後由 twinkle 於 2011-9-14 11:32 編輯

回復 46# wipa2
不明你意思是想話我們知3id都是同一個人嗎?   Whether k1w is wipa or even wipa2 is kind of obvious, but that is besides the point.  我就好明顯知道你好用心想我們提防CK, MTR, 生果, 政掍在這裡出現所以不斷開不同id這樣寫.   所以你叫我地懷疑波蘿, 但証據在那裡.   沒理由話波蘿沒有說明佢係唔係CK人馬就當佢係.   起碼他一直參與會議都係業主身份出席.   不相信佢咁蠢要自己出錢買層樓來撐CK.   你不知道好多CK 員工都唱衰自己公司咩.   

但我就唔知你係唔係業住定住戶, 又或者只是搞事份子(因為你憎恨CK).  咁我地都唔知你既背景.   你咁著緊這屋苑如你是業主就出來投OC, 聽一下參選人的介紹.  否則你的目的何在?

TOP

本帖最後由 Kit 於 2011-9-14 11:12 編輯

k1w, wipa, wipa2都是用同一IP註冊。
請你勿繼續這樣做。我們有權禁止你在這「發表」。
我們這個FORUM一向人人都光明磊落,唔興呢頭用一個IP,嗰頭又用另一個IP。皆因大家都言行一致,無需用不同的網名來做自己說話的榥子﹗

TOP

k1w, wipa, wipa2 歡迎你在業主會現真身.   希望到時見到你交流一下.   告密給我們知仲有邊個係CK人馬咁死蠢買層樓去支持個衰老板.   等我笑佢白痴.

TOP

返回列表